Legal Opinion

Pimlott v. Hall

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to Middlesex Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The defendants in error sued below to enforce a lien for materials furnished to Sylvester towards the construction of a house for the plaintiff in error. The sole question now pending arises upon an exception to the ruling of the trial court, that the filing of the contract between Sylvester and the plaintiff in error, without the accompanying-specifications, did not bar the lien.

The contract required Sylvester “ well and sufficiently to-erect and finish the mason work of the new building * * * agreeably to the drawings and specifications * *…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Atlantic Roofing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
  2. La Foucherie v. KnutzenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
  3. Campbell, Morrell & Co. v. LehockySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. Freedman v. SandknopNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API