Legal Opinion
stc.unm v. Intel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 17, 2014No. 2013-1241PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by plaintiff-appellant STC.UNM, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by defendant-appellee Intel Corporation. The petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter, the petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered that:(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied.(2) The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Abbott Laboratories v. Diamedix Corporation, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Antennasys, Inc. v. Aqyr Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Advanced Video Technologies, LLC v. HTC Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Advanced Video Technologies v. Htc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Advanced Video Technologies v. Htc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018