Hudson Coat Co. v. Hauf
Wyoming Supreme Court
Error to the District Court, Fremont County, Hon'. Charles E. Carpenter, Judge. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Error was prosecuted from a judgment of a Justice of the Peace to the District Court by the plaintiff in error, and it was claimed: (i) That the justice had no jurisdiction over plaintiff in error for the following reasons : (a).There was no pleading filed with the justice as contemplated by law.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court, Fremont County, Hon'. Charles E. Carpenter, Judge. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Error was prosecuted from a judgment of a Justice of the Peace to the District Court by the plaintiff in error, and it was claimed: (i) That the justice had no jurisdiction over plaintiff in error for the following reasons : (a).There was no pleading filed with the justice as contemplated by law. (b) If a pleading was filed, the service of summons was not in accordance with law, to all of which objection was properly made. (2) That judgment could not be rendered…
1Opinion of the Court
Beard, Justice. ’
In this case the defendant in error, Hauf, recovered judgment against the plaintiff in error, Hudson Coal Company, in justice’s court for $138.15 and costs. The Coal Co. took the case to the District Court on error, where the judgment of the justice was affirmed. The Coal Co. brings ■the case here on error.
The action was brought by Hauf against the Coal Co. as garnishee in three suits brought by Hauf against three different defendants, on the ground that the disclosure of the garnishee in its answer in each of said cases was unsatisfactory to the plaintiff. The action was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wesley v. MilfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Honeycutt v. NyquistWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- Board of Commissioners v. ShaffnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
- Nelson Distilling Co. v. LockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Todd v. PetersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hance v. StraatsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Great Falls Transfer and Storage Company, a Corporation Doing Business as Suhr Transport v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Grieve v. HuberWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Farmers' State Bank of Riverton v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Jaramillo v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.