Legal Opinion

Rooney v. Greiner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 1, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit by a broker for commissions on sale of real estate: There was no written authority specifying rate of commission, as required by the original section 10 of the statute of frauds, and the reliance was on the amendments of 1918, page 1030. The questions to be determined were whether the plaintiff was actually employed and promised a commission, whether he secured .the purchaser to whom defendants made the sale and whether, within the five days provided by the act, he served on defendants the notice specified in the act in due form. The court below found for the plaintiff, and in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Soloff v. Atlantic Coast Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  2. Fontana v. Polish National Alliance of BrooklynSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API