Legal Opinion

In re Lindy-Friedman Clothing Co.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 17, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Lindy-Snedman Clothing Company, Inc., bankrupt. On petition to review order of referee.

1Opinion of the Court

CLAYTON, District Judge.

This matter is before me on the petition of S. L- Tyson and N. W. Tyson as landlords, for review of the order of the referee in bankruptcy of June 10, 1921, decreeing:

“First. That the trustee in bankruptcy in the above-entitled matter is entitled to the possession of the premises and the ownership of the leasehold *454constituted by that certain lease entered into under date of the 21st day of June, 1919, by and between S. L. and N. W. Tyson through their duly authorized agents, Molton Kealty Company, as landlords, and Samuel Friedman and Sol Lindy, as lessees.
“Second.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Frank v. Stratford-HandcockWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Walker v. WadleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Elyton Land Co. v. South & North Alabama RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Emery v. HillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waukegan Times Theatre Corp. v. ConradAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  2. Henry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  3. Stamm v. BuchananNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In re Clerc Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  5. Gem Theatre Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API