Legal Opinion

Village of Sebring v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1931No. 22525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The essential requisites sought to he attained by the law with reference to notices of this character are to bring knowledge home to the owner of the property of the passage of a resolution by the council to improve the street in question and that the cost thereof will be assessed upon adjoining property owners. The law further requires that such notice shall be served on the owner in the same manner as a summons is served in a civil action. The sections relative thereto provide, in part, as follows: Section 3818. “A notice of the passage of such resolution shall be served by the clerk of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. de Frece v. LathersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Entre Nous Club v. TorontoUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Slater v. Incorporated Town of AdelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Melvin v. City of ChillicotheOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Entre Nous Club v. TorontoUtah Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API