Legal Opinion

In Re Burgh

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 10, 1933No. 52917, 52919PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, District Judge.

These are proceedings under section 74 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 202). The court has heretofore entered orders approving the petitions as properly filed under said section 74. The court has also made orders referring the matters to one of the referees of this court to take such further proceedings therein as are required by said section 74.

It appears from the papers before the court that, after the orders of reference were entered, the debtors, by their counsel, appeared before the referee and procured the issuance of subpoenas duces tecum, calling upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. Underground Electric Rys. Co. of London v. OwsletCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  4. Pascault v. CochranUnited States Circuit Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Alleghany CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Fisher v. Hamilton (In Re Teknek, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Bradford v. FaheyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  4. Heyman v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  5. G. S. F. Corp. v. Inleasing Corp. (In Re G. S. F. Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API