Legal Opinion

Kees v. Maxim

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case made from Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant assigns error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Maxim was sued in justice’s court by summons, of which a copy follows, viz.:

“ State oe Michigan, )
“ County of Osceola, f
“In the name of the People of the State of Michigan, you are hereby commanded to summon Manley Maxim, if he shall be found in your county, to appear before me, one of the justices of the peace in and for said county, at my office in the township of Sherman, in said county, on the 3d day of January, A. D. 1893, at 10 o’clock in the *495forenoon, then and there to answer to Albert Kees, as next friend to Edward Fassett, in a plea of trespass on the case upon promises, to his…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kamieniecki v. Garden City Hospital, OsteopathicMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Graham v. NippressMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Marquette Prison Warden v. MeadowsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API