Legal Opinion

Bayson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 2012No. 4D11-2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On Order to Show Cause

2Per curiam

This court by unpublished opinion affirmed the denial of appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. We issued an order to show cause why this court should not impose the sanction of no longer accepting petitioner’s pro se filings. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). Having considered appellant’s response, which reargues the meritless points that he has raised repeatedly, we exercise our discretion and now impose the sanction of no longer accepting petitioner’s pro se filings.

This case constitutes appellant’s eighth appeal of a Rule 3.800(a)…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Bover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Ives v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. McCutcheon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael Anthony Baysen v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API