Legal Opinion

Newport Water Works v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 6, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit. Certified on agreed statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff against the City of Newport to recover at the rate of three hundred dollars for supplying water to three constantly flowing drinking fountains belonging to the city for and during a certain period. It was originally brought in the District Court where a decision was entered for the defendant and a jury trial was claimed by the plaintiff. The case has been certified to this court by the Superior Court under Gen. Laws, 1909, cap. 298, § 4, on an agreed statement of facts.

■ The agreed statement of facts is as follows: “In the above entitled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Woolsey v. . FunkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Sattler v. . HallockNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Mueller v. Northwestern UniversityIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. M. S. Alper & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. Lyons v. Salve Regina CollegeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
  4. Shulton, Inc. v. Apex, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  5. Portsmouth Water Fire Dist. v. Stone Bridge Fire Dist., 98-0242 (1999)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API