Legal Opinion
Bell v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 16, 2014No. Civil Action No. 14-1072 (BAH)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The pro se plaintiff in this action, Clifton Bell, seeks $5,000 in damages from the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Mid-Atlantic States, Inc. (“Kaiser”) (collectively, the “defendants”), based on an alleged failure of Defendant Kaiser to reimburse the plaintiff for a medical co-pay. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. Since the face of the complaint indicates that this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this matter, the plaintiffs claim is dismissed.
I.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Budowich v. PelosiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Office of Special CounselDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Hemp Industries Association v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Hudson, Jr. v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Karakenyan v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.