Legal Opinion

Richey v. Erlanger Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

It is provided by the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act that “in all claims for compensation for hernia, or rupture, resulting from injury by accident arising out of and in the course of the employee’s employment,” certain facts must be definitely proven to the satisfaction of the Industrial Commission; otherwise, compensation cannot be awarded. In the instant case, these facts were not so proven to the satisfaction of the Commission, and for that reason compensation was denied. On respondent’s appeal from the award of the Commission to the Superior Court, the judge beard the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ussery v. Erlanger Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Massey v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Clark v. . Woolen MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Winberry v. . Farley Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Winberry v. Farley Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API