Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Hoagland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from order of surrogate, Kings county. Application by Elizabeth M. Hoagland to compel Henry P. Robinson and others, executors of the estate of Isaac E. Hoagland, deceased, to deposit the funds of the estate with the Colonial Trust Company. From an order requiring such deposit to the joint.credit of the executors, Henry P. Robinson appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJerks, J.

Robinson, an executor of Hoagland, appeals from an order of the surrogate of Kings county, made under section 2602 of the Code of Civil Procedure, after hearing all parties, that he deposit in the Colonial Trust Company $8,000, money of the estate of said Hoagland, to be subject to the joint order of the three executors. I think that the order of the learned surrogate was a fair exercise of his discretion, inasmuch as there was proof that all of the parties interested in the estate and two of the executors were of like mind, and that grave doubts were expressed as to the responsibility of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. . BurrowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Whiton v. . SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Vroom v. Van HorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  4. Miller v. Jones' AdministratorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. Valentine v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1832

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Barrett, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1899
  2. In re Hoagland's EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API