Legal Opinion

Hellard v. Hubbard

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 15, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Nunn

Reversing.

Hubbard is the claimant and occupant of about fifty-five acres of land. It is conceded that unless his adverse *305possession has ripened into a legal title, then the right of the Hellards should prevail.

The case was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury, and his judgment was in favor of the Hubbards, who claimed it by adverse possession.

The possession under which the Hubbards claimed begins with Elihu Roberts in 1894. Roberts had lived on the land several years before this, but had abandoned it, and gone to Arkansas, where he lived…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watson's Exr. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. White v. McNabbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Cardwell v. Sprigg's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
  4. Moss v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
  5. Jones v. McCauley's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moren v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Bibb v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Britt v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API