Legal Opinion
Lee v. Timken
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Emeline Lee against Mary A. Timken. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Dismissed.
1Per curiam
As we have had occasion to point out In the case of Sheffield v. Robinson (decided herewith) 30 N. Y. Supp. 799, an order sustaining or overruling a demurrer is not appealable; the appeal must be from the judgment. Appeal accordingly dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sheffield v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- First National Bank v. EatonNew York Supreme Court · 1895