Legal Opinion

Leftwich v. Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 26, 2012No. 1D12-1739PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In accordance with our decision in McBride v. Moore, 780 So.2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), the circuit court correctly concluded that after being sentenced as an habitual offender, petitioner was ineligible for provisional credits on all his sentences, including those imposed before he was designated an habitual offender. Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of certiora-ri on the merits, but CERTIFY that our *405decision conflicts with Downs v. Crosby, 874 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

WOLF, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., Concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Downs v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. McBride v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robert B. Leftwich v. Florida Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Robert B. Leftwich v. Florida Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2014