Gutierrez v. WELLBORN PAINT MANUFACTURING CO.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
This appeal is concerned with the “actual knowledge” which excuses written notice in a workmen’s compensation case. See § 59-10-13.4(B), N.M.S.A. 1953. The actual knowledge required is knowledge of an accident and knowledge of a compensable injury. Roberson v. Powell, 78 N.M. 69, 428 P.2d 471 (1967); Smith v. State, 79 N.M. 25, 439 P.2d 242 (Ct.App.1968). The trial court found there was “no actual knowledge of a compensable injury” and dismissed plaintiff’s claim; he appeals. The issue is whether there is substantial evidence to support the finding. If the challenged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lozano v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Winter v. Roberson Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Waymire v. Signal Oil Field Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Baca v. Swift & CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Witt v. Marcum Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Herndon v. Albuquerque Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hammond v. KerseyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Herndon v. Albuquerque Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978