Legal Opinion
Maharaj v. Looknanan
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided February 16, 1982No. Civil No. 525/1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSilverlight, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This case, improperly entitled “An action for property settlement,” is now before the Court for disposition. No evidence of the fraud alleged in Count One of the counterclaim has been adduced and that Count is accordingly dismissed.
THE FACTS
An agreement for the sale and purchase of real property covering Plot 64 Estate Diamond, Queens Quarter, St. Croix, was entered into between defendant Santiago and Midland Equity Corporation1 on August 5, 1968. This contract was recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds, St. Croix. The purchase price was to be $4,100, $300 of which…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Geary v. GearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Binns v. MaddoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Nuquist v. BauscherIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Inniss v. InnissSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
- Morton v. MortonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1996