Legal Opinion

Silberschein v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 4, 1923No. 6784PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

The subject-matter of this cause is before the court for the second time on motion to dismiss a petition brought against the United States under the so-called Tucker Act (24 Statutes at Large, 505, as modified by subdivision 20 of section 24 of the Judicial Code. [Comp. St. § 991(20)]), claiming damages in the sum of $10,000. The previous petition by the same plaintiff was dismissed by this court (280 Fed. 917) for reasons set forth in the written opinion then filed. The various sections of the War Risk Insurance Act, as changed by the different amendments thereto, were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Public Clearing House v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. United States Ex Rel. Riverside Oil Co. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Nichols v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  3. Trapp v. DykesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API