Legal Opinion

MITCHELL STUKEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 11, 2018No. 18-0600PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MITCHELL STUKEL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-600 [July 11, 2018] Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 43-1994-CF000906A. Mitchell Stukel, South Bay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The circuit court treated appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion as a rule 3.850 motion and then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Michael Darrin Zill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. AYALA-LAIES v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Paul v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Holt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAMANTHA MULLINS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API