Legal Opinion

King v. King

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1987No. 86-293Published

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The appellants, plaintiffs below, Dale King and her minor son Marcel King, filed suit for recovery of medical expenses paid by the mother, Dale King, on behalf of her son, Marcel, and for injuries suffered by Marcel when he wrecked a three-wheeled motor vehicle. They sued Marcel’s grandfather and grandmother, D.J. King and Emilene King, for failing to properly supervise Marcel, and for allowing him to operate the three-wheeled vehicle. In a separate suit they sued the owner of the vehicle, Ronnie Tuggle, for negligence in allowing Marcel to operate the vehicle. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rambo v. RamboSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Attwood v. Estate of AttwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Thomas Ex Rel. Inmon v. InmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Ikani v. BennettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Brown, Admr. v. Cole, Admr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API