In the Matter of Delancey
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The act of 1858 was modified by the act of 1872 so as to prohibit the vacation of assessments for the irregularities complained of in the petition in this case, and the proceedings were not commenced within the time prescribed by the saving clause of the latter act.
The vacation of the assessment of the lands of Whitney for the same improvement does not operate to render the assessment for the whole improvement invalid.
The order in the Whitney case does not purport to vacate the assessment upon any other lands. The "party aggrieved" can only apply to vacate, and the order cannot affect any…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Chase v. . ChaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Tifft v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Central School District No. 1 v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Trimmer v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Chilcott v. City of BuffaloSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.