Legal Opinion

Ralph Arnold Smith, Jr v. James M. Hood, III

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2018No. 2016–CA–01438–SCTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ISHEE, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

¶ 1. Ralph Smith sued the Attorney General of Mississippi, Jim Hood, in the Hinds County Circuit Court. Smith filed various causes of action, each of which was premised on Smith's purely legal argument that the Office of the Attorney General is in the judicial branch of the state government. The circuit court disagreed with Smith and found that, as a matter of law, the Office of Attorney General is in the executive branch, and so, the circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Hood. Smith now appeals.

¶ 2. This case requires this Court to address whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dye v. State Ex Rel. HaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Conrod v. HolderMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re FordiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dontarious Vontae Davis a/k/a "Man-Man" v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API