Legal Opinion

Anspach v. St. Bernard (City)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1951No. 7481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, J.:

An action for damages was commenced by the plaintiff named in the above entitled cause against the defendant municipality; it being alleged that such plaintiff was injured by reason of the failure of the defendant municipality to keep a certain street therein in repair. This action was instituted to recover damages for injuries to the person of the then plaintiff. The original plaintiff above named in the title of this case died and one Sylvia Anspach was appointed administratrix of Kate Lewis, the above named plaintiff. Upon motion, suggesting the, death of such original…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Case v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Bell v. Cincinnati Transit Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API