Legal Opinion
Batcheller v. Hulme
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1913No. 11124PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Franklin county, Holcomb, J., entered September 14, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to cancel a deed and to quiet title.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
A. A. Batcheller and Isaac Hiubne associated themselves in an enterprise designed to exploit a cur*98rent motor and pump theretofore designed and patented by one Courtright. Hulme was a man of means and the owner of the Vulcan Iron Works in the city of Seattle. Batcheller owned certain desert land bordering the Columbia river, and had become impressed with the feasibility and practicability of the motor. The parties reduced their contract to writing,
“July 30th, 1907.
“Be it known to whom it may concern, that we the undersigned', I. Hulme, Mgr. of the Vulcan Iron Works, of Seattle, Washington,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Alcala v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. VelsirWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. EldredgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. GonzalesWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Rubin v. ColesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.