Legal Opinion

Calabrese v. Tendercare of Michigan, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 2004No. Docket No. 243697PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff alleged that defendants wrongfully terminated her employment because she refused to fire employees for engaging in unionizing activities. Defendants appeal by leave granted the trial court’s partial denial of their motion for summary disposition, arguing that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)1 preempts plaintiffs claims and, therefore, the trial court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. We reverse.

*2581. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff was hired as an administrator at Wayne Total Living Center (WTLC), a nursing home facility operated by defendant Tendercare of Michigan,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Reliance Fuel Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lewandowski v. NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT CO., LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Lewis v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Anthony Henry v. Laborers Local 1191Michigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Calabrese v. TENDERCARE OF MICH. INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Anthony Henry v. Laborers Local 1191Michigan Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API