Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Syntronic AB
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 21-cv-03610-SI (JCS) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. RECONSIDERATION 10 SYNTRONIC AB, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 137 Defendants. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Defendants (collectively, “Syntronic”) move for reconsideration of the Court’s prior order 14 requiring Defendant Syntronic (Beijing) Technology R&D Center Co., Ltd. (“Syntronic Beijing”) 15 to produce computers for inspection in the United States, arguing that China’s Personal 16 Information Protection Law (the “PIPL”)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Stephen A. Saccoccia, United States of America v. Stephen A. Saccoccia, United States of America v. Stephen A. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Stark v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1927