Legal Opinion

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Syntronic AB

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 24, 2022No. 3:21-cv-03610Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 21-cv-03610-SI (JCS) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. RECONSIDERATION 10 SYNTRONIC AB, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 137 Defendants. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Defendants (collectively, “Syntronic”) move for reconsideration of the Court’s prior order 14 requiring Defendant Syntronic (Beijing) Technology R&D Center Co., Ltd. (“Syntronic Beijing”) 15 to produce computers for inspection in the United States, arguing that China’s Personal 16 Information Protection Law (the “PIPL”)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Stephen A. Saccoccia, United States of America v. Stephen A. Saccoccia, United States of America v. Stephen A. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Stark v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API