Legal Opinion

Aetna v. Inter-City, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 24, 1998No. CV-96-556-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Aetna v. Inter-City, et al. CV-96-556-M 03/24/98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Aetna Casualty, Plaintiff v. Civil No. 96-556-M Inter-Citv Construction Co., Inc. and Paul E. Pandelena, Defendants O R D E R Upon review of the Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement and for Attorneys' Fees, and having heard the parties regarding same, the court hereby enters the following order: 1. The settlement between the parties as memorialized in the letter from plaintiff's counsel to defendants' counsel dated February 13, 1998, is binding and enforceable and is hereby ordered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Clark v. MitchellDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API