Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Osman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1848PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Case reserved from Oakland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court,

Whipple, J.

The only question presented in the case is whether the declaration contains a sufficient description of the property replevied. The action, it is to be observed, is for the wrongful detention ■of “ a quantity of com (consisting of about 200 bushels), and a quantity ■of rye (consisting of about 100 bushels).

It is well settled that in actions for a tort, it is not, in general, sufficient to alledge that the defendant injured or took divers goods and chattels of the plaintiff without giving a description of them; and that more particularly is necessary in replevin and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Witt v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pierce v. LangdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Farwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Hawley v. KocherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  5. Dillon v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API