Stevens v. Osman
Michigan Supreme Court
Case reserved from Oakland Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court,
Whipple, J.
The only question presented in the case is whether the declaration contains a sufficient description of the property replevied. The action, it is to be observed, is for the wrongful detention ■of “ a quantity of com (consisting of about 200 bushels), and a quantity ■of rye (consisting of about 100 bushels).
It is well settled that in actions for a tort, it is not, in general, sufficient to alledge that the defendant injured or took divers goods and chattels of the plaintiff without giving a description of them; and that more particularly is necessary in replevin and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- De Witt v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1835
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pierce v. LangdonIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
- Farwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Hawley v. KocherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
- Dillon v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.