Legal Opinion

Cousar v. New London Engineering Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1991No. 23495PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

Appellant New London Engineering Company, Inc. (New London), appeals from two circuit court orders; the first of which denied New London’s motion to amend its Answer and Third Party Complaint, and the second retained jurisdiction of issues not on appeal during pendency of an appeal from the first order. We affirm.

New London manufactured a bag flattening machine, Serial Number 78158, manufacture date February 22,1978, which it sold with an electric motor, but no controls or electrical connections. New London attached a label warning the user to stop the machine prior to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shiflet v. EllerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Hyder v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. South Carolina National Bank v. StoneDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1990
  4. Lightner v. Duke Power Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Talkington v. Atria Reclamelucifers Fabrieken BVCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Brown v. Shredex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1999
  3. Southern Guaranty Insurance v. Central Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Talkington Ex Rel. Moore v. Atria Reclamelucifers Fabrieken BVCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hill v. Associates Roofing & Construction, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API