Appeal of Sawmill Brook Development Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
This is an appeal by the taxpayer, Sawmill Brook Development Co. (Sawmill or the taxpayer), from a decision of the board of tax and land appeals (board). The taxpayer challenges the methodology used by the Town of Litchfield’s (town) appraiser and accepted by the board in reviewing two change of use tax assessments levied pursuant to RSA 79-A:7, I (Supp. 1986) against the taxpayer. We affirm.
The town levied the assessments on a two-phased development: phase I, a planned 50-lot subdivision consisting of 80.1 acres, and phase II, a planned 93-lot subdivision with a total acreage of 97.63 acres.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State National Bank v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Sklar Realty, Inc. v. Town of MerrimackSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Blue Mountain Forest Ass'n v. Town of CroydonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Demoulas v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Steele v. Town of AllenstownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edward Rose Building Co. v. Independence TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1990