Legal Opinion
Molenaar v. United Cattle Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 30, 1996No. C2-96-32Published
1Opinion of the Court
553 N.W.2d 424 (1996)
Orville MOLENAAR, Appellant,
v.
UNITED CATTLE COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Respondent,
v.
Michael J. FRANK, Third-Party Defendant.
No. C2-96-32.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
July 30, 1996.
Jerry W. Snider, Charles F. Webber, Faegre & Benson Professional Limited Liability Partnership, Minneapolis, for Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellant.
Patrick McLaughlin, Todd C. Pearson, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, for Respondent.
Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and PETERSON and HARTEN, JJ.
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
On appeal from the denial of posttrial…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.