Legal Opinion
(PS) Ringgold v. Burgett Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 17, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00836Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD RINGGOLD, No. 2:22-cv-00836-DAD-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 BURGETT, INC., doing business as FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PIANODISC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff proceeds pro se with claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) 19 and state law claims. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 21 Defendants’ motion to dismiss filed on September 15, 2022 (ECF No. 9) is before the 22 court. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.