Legal Opinion

Benavides v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1971No. Nos. 44253-44255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The convictions are for robbery by assault; the punishment for each appellant, five years.

Each appellant contends that he was induced to change his plea from not guilty to guilty during the course of the trial because he believed that he would be granted probation when sentenced.

Cleo Munoz, two other co-defendants and the appellants, Aresteo L. Benavides, Albert F. Garcia and Juan Solis, were indicted for the same offense in six separate indictments, bearing the same case number. Each appellant here was represented during trial by separate retained counsel of his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hoskins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weatherly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Horne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API