Legal Opinion
Rush v. High Springs
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 23, 2012No. 1D11-3714PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL, JAMES H., J., Associate Judge.
This appeal concerns whether Appellee City of High Springs (hereinafter the City) violated the Public Records Act by redacting questions and answers from a pre-employment polygraph report before releasing it to Appellant (hereinafter Rush). The trial court found that the City had properly redacted the material pursuant to section 119.071(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2010). This provision exempts from the Public Records Act any examination questions and answers prepared and received by a government agency for the purpose of employment. Given the plain meaning…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- American Bankers Life Assur. Co. of Fla. v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- GTC, INC. v. EdgarSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Tribune Co. v. Public RecordsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morris Publishing Group, LLC v. Florida Department of EducationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Jones v. Miami Herald Media Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016