Kotler v. Kaplan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order requiring plaintiff separately to state and number aEeged causes of action reversed on the law, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten doEars costs. Plaintiff states but one cause of action. It is aEeged that, while the partnership between plaintiff and the two individual defendants was in effect, the latter took aE the property of the partnership and placed it in the possession and under the control of the corporation, in which they were the sole parties in interest. This property was used in the business of the corporation, together with property of the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Philip Shlansky & Bro. v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948