Legal Opinion

Palmer v. CHELSEA FINANCING PARTNERSHIP, LP.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 3, 2006No. 2:05-cv-01935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ENGLAND, District Judge.

Following its dismissal from this litigation on or about January 28, 2006, Defendant Claire’s Stores, Inc. (erroneously sued herein as CLAIRE’S BOUTIQUES, INC. dba CLAIRE’S BOUTIQUES) (“Claire’s”) now asks this Court to award it attorney’s fees in the amount of $18,631.25, either as a prevailing party under the Americans with Disabilities Act (pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12205, or alternatively due to Plaintiffs alleged sanctionable conduct under 28 U.S.C. § 1927) (which authorizes sanctions against a party who unreasonably and vexatiously multiplies legal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rick Summers v. A. Teichert & Son, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Schutts v. Bently Nevada Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1997
  3. Peters v. Winco Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watson v. County of YavapaiDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  2. Goff v. SALAZAR ROOFING & CONST., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. Grechko v. Calistoga Spa, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API