Legal Opinion

Faust v. Greater Lakeside Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 2001No. 98-CA-2853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

| .TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s judgment granting a Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Defendants. We affirm the trial court’s judgment and find that based upon the undisputed facts, Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Specifically, we find that Defendants did not commit an intentional tort by allegedly failing to provide adequate security measures for Plaintiffs. Further, we find that Defendants are not vicariously liable for the intentional acts committed by their employees because the employees were not in the “course and scope”of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. White v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. LeBrane v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  5. Baumeister v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Faust v. Greater Lakeside Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API