Legal Opinion

Napert v. Government Employees Insurance

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 22, 2014No. Civil No. 13-10530-FDSPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SAYLOR, District Judge.

This is a claim under the Massachusetts wage and hour laws. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff Michael Napert worked as an adjuster for defendant Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”). He alleges that GEICO intentionally failed to pay him his earned hourly wages as required by the Massachusetts Wage Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, § 148, and intentionally failed to pay him overtime wages as required by the Massachusetts Fair Minimum Wage Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151, § 1A.

GE…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. SteevesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Boston & Albany Railroad v. ReardonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Levesque v. Schroder Inv. Mgmt. N. Am., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  2. Lambirth v. Advanced Auto, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  3. Furtado v. Republic Parking System, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  4. Levesque v. Schroder Investment Management North America Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  5. MARN v. ELS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API