Legal Opinion
Siderius, Inc. v. M.V. "Amilla"
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 19, 1989No. Nos. 922, 739 and 842, Dockets 88-7880, 88-7884 and 88-7898PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Amilla Compania Naviera, S.A. (Amilla) and defendants Astramar Cansac B.S. A.S. and Canadian Forest Navigation Company, Ltd. (collectively Canadian) appeal from the October 4, 1988 judgment after a bench trial before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Carter, J.), finding Amil-la liable for damages to goods in transport, and further regarding Canadian to indemnify Amilla for 50 percent of the damages. We affirm.
FACTS
Amilla is the owner of the M/V Amilla (the Ship), a bulk carrier sailing under the Greek flag, that was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M. v. Farland, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Vigra, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees v. Seaboard Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Philippine Sugar Centrals Agency v. Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Davis v. DittmarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- S. C. Loveland Co. v. Eastern States Farmer's ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fednav, Ltd. v. Isoramar, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. S/S JasmineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Thyssen Steel Company v. M/v Kavo Yerakas, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Sonito Shipping Co. v. Sun United Maritime Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- GTS Industries S.A. v. S/S "Havtjeld"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.