Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Huddell v. Levin

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 5, 1976No. Nos. 75-1851 to 75-1854Published

1ConcurrenceRosenn, Circuit Judge

Except for his views on the plaintiff’s burden of proof set forth in Part III A, I join in Judge Aldisert’s carefully analyzed opinion and concur in its result.

The panel decided that Huddell had adduced sufficient evidence to submit to the jury the questions whether a defect existed and whether it was a proximate cause of Dr. Huddell’s death. On retrial, however, Huddell will fail to meet her burden of proof according to the majority unless she can show (1) that there existed an alternate safer design “practicable under the circumstances,” (2) the extent of the injuries which would have…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Kelly v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Robert L. Turcotte, Administrator of the Estate of Gerard P. Turcotte v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API