Legal Opinion
Haley v. Sorani (In Re Richmond Produce Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided June 26, 1990No. 13-03098PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
LESLIE TCHAIKOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Defendants Donald Sorani and the Estate of Patricia Sorani (collectively hereinafter “Sorani”) move to dismiss two claims seeking to avoid fraudulent transfers and to recover their value from Sorani pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 550(a)(1) as the entity for whose benefit the transfers were made. Sorani contends that these claims are insufficient as a matter of law. 1 For the reasons stated herein, the motion is denied as to the first claim for relief and granted as to the second without prejudice. Plaintiff is given twenty days from the date…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Bonded Financial Services, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. European American BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Louis W. Levit, Trustee of V.N. Deprizio Construction Co. v. Ingersoll Rand Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- National Bank of Newport v. National Herkimer County Bank of Little FallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Sue De La Cruz v. James TormeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Bullion Reserve of North America, a California Corporation, Debtor. Curtis B. Danning, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Michael L. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Freeland v. Enodis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Branch v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Kendall v. Sorani (In Re Richmond Produce Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.