Legal Opinion

Doe v. Burgos

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 5, 1994No. 4-93-0576PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Jane Doe, a correctional officer, filed a complaint seeking that Violetta Burgos, an inmate at Dwight Correctional Center, undergo a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies test; that the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) be forced to take whatever steps necessary to see that Burgos is tested; and that the test results be disclosed to Doe. The trial court granted Doe’s requested relief. IDOC appeals. Burgos does not appeal. We affirm.

Doe filed her complaint against Burgos and IDOC on February 3, 1993. Doe sought the aforementioned relief based on section 7(c) of the AIDS…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Healy v. VaupelIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Schwing v. MilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Smith v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Noorman v. Department of PubLic Works & BuildingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rockford Memorial Hospital v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Walker v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Rockford Mem v. Dept. of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. City of Carbondale v. BowerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Doe v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API