Legal Opinion
Deanna English v. Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 5, 2017No. 17-1249UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
Deanna English appeals pro se from the District Court’s order dismissing English’s action against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“the Commissioner”). We will affirm.
In 2013, English was notified by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) of an overpayment of supplemental security income benefits (“SSI”) due to work activity. English requested reconsideration of the agency’s determination and, before the reconsideration was accomplished, sought a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). The ALJ was unable to locate any denial of reconsideration…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Gale R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Kathleen FITZGERALD, Appellant v. Kenneth S. APFEL Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Beattie v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- BUTLER v. SAULDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- CUSH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- DAVIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- FALKENSTEIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- FELDER v. COLVINDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.