State v. Lemire
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The parties have stipulated that the only issue in this case is whether RSA 651:57-61 (Supp. 1975), creating a sentence review division, precludes the superior court from considering the defendant’s petition to reduce his sentence as a petition for suspension of sentence under RSA 651:20, :21. We hold that the Court (Loughlin, J.) may consider the petition as one for the suspension of sentence under those sections.
The parties agree that the term of court at which the defendant was sentenced on June 21, 1973, having expired and he being now in the process of serving his sentence, the court’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glover v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- State v. WoodmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Hayes v. ArchambaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
- Public Service Co. v. Lovejoy Granite Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. PartlowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009