Legal Opinion

Beers v. Jeson Enterprises

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 2000No. 97C-892419, 97C-892420 CA A102004 (Control), A102005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*724LINDER, J.

Plaintiff appeals a circuit court judgment affirming an arbitrator’s determination that she is not entitled to attorney fees under ORS 20.080. We review for errors of law. Koster Remodeling & Construction, Inc. v. Jataka, 155 Or App 142, 145, 963 P2d 726 (1998) (entitlement to attorney fees is a legal question). We conclude that plaintiff was entitled to attorney fees on one of the two claims on which she sought fees. We therefore reverse and remand for a determination of reasonable fees to be awarded to plaintiff.

This case arises out of an incident in which plaintiff, while…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hiber v. Creditors Collection Service of Lincoln County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Bennett v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Koster Remodeling & Construction, Inc. v. JatakaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Capital One Bank v. FortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Bedford v. Merety Monger TrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Frost v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Callais v. HenricksenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Huntley v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API