Legal Opinion

Thorson v. Weimer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOheistiaNsoN, J.

Wirtz, who was interpleaded as a defendant to the garnishee' action, appeals from the order of the county court in Cass county denying bis motion for a change of venue from Cass county to Benson county. The material and undisputed facts are as follows: On or about August 31, 1929, the plaintiff brought this action in the county court of Cass county to recover of the defendant Weimer $250.00 upon a promissory note, and $73.50 upon a book account. At the time of the issuance of the summons in the main action, the plaintiff also instituted a garnishment action, naming the Fillmore Equity…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ivanusch v. Great Northern Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kiley v. MecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McConnon & Co. v. SlettenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Smail v. GilruthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Park, Grant, & Morris v. NordaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ott v. KelleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Clark v. ClevelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ruchverg v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In re the Appeal of PeschelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Re PeschelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API