State v. Golden
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Defendant Steve Wayne Golden appeals from his conviction of perpetrating a hoax on law enforcement officers by use of a false bomb or other device. Defendant primarily argues on appeal that evidence of prior acts against his estranged wife was improperly admitted under Rule 404(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence. Because, however, that evidence tended to show that defendant intended to deceive people with the realistic fake bomb he admittedly *138made and because those acts were part of the chain of circumstances leading to the charged offense, we hold that the trial court did…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- State v. RouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. RouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022