Legal Opinion

Hlanko v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.

Defendant moves for dismissal of the complaint upon the ground that maintenance of the action is time-barred. The action was commenced more than one year and 30 days from the accrual of the cause. However, it was commenced within one year and 90 days from the occurrence.

With respect to the time for the service of notice of claim, section 50-e of the General Municipal Law provides a 90-day period, and in Robinson v. New York City Housing Auth. (12 Misc 2d 200, affd. 8 A D 2d 747, affd. 7 N Y 2d 908) the court determined that section 50-e of the General Municipal Law supersedes the Public…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barchet v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hlanko v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API