Legal Opinion
United States v. Raymond W. Zwego, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1981No. 80-1008PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant-appellant Zwego was charged and convicted of knowingly making material false statements in connection with two applications for loans to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014, and interstate transportation of a falsely made and forged security in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. William Herman JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Joseph P. CandellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. George WuagneuxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Nestor Uribe, United States of America v. Leon Alberior Rave-Arias, United States of America v. David RashCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CastellanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- United States v. Daniel Michael Daly, Harold Dean Klemp, Joseph Diaz, Gene Floyd Criswell, and Michael Richard RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Otto Pace, Travis D. Leonard, and Clifton Andrew CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.